MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406291738 · doi:10.1080/13549839.2024.2436033

The final straw: a commentary on science, social justice and sustainability

2025· article· en· W4406291738 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLocal Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilitySocial justiceEnvironmental justiceStrawEnvironmental ethicsEconomic JusticeSocial sustainabilitySustainability scienceSociologyPolitical scienceNatural resource economicsEnvironmental resource managementSocial scienceEconomicsEcologyLawAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plastic straw bans have become emblematic of local environmental policy, yet their implementation often overlooks key social justice concerns. This commentary explores Wellington City Council's plastic straw-free initiative, critically examining its implications for the disability community through critical disability theory (CDT). Drawing on systems thinking and post-normal science (PNS), this paper argues that environmental policies must avoid conventional, linear solutions that fail to account for marginalised voices. Complexity leadership is proposed as a framework for navigating adaptive systems like cities, ensuring that sustainability efforts are inclusive and just. By integrating CDT with systems thinking, the commentary highlights the need for policies that balance ecological goals with the lived realities of diverse communities, advancing the discourse on just sustainabillites at the local level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it