MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406292869 · doi:10.1080/00049182.2024.2443236

From open fields to inside worlds: three generations of childhood in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

2025· article· en· W4406292869 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Turner, Irham Irham, Meriky Lo

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Geographer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChildren's Rights and Participation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMarsden FundSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeographyEconomic geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores how childhood experiences in urban Indonesia have changed across three generations, aiming to understand how these different cohorts have navigated and adapted to their environments amidst continuous urban and social transformations. Focusing on Yogyakarta – a city marked by a unique blend of tradition and modernity – we explore how changes in the urban fabric and socio-economic circumstances have affected children’s play, socialisation and mobility and their agency in navigating their urban environments. Drawing from in-depth interviews with 12 three-generation families, our findings reveal generational shifts in play patterns, from the communal and outdoor activities that grandparents enjoyed as children, to the increasingly supervised and indoor play of today’s children. Growing concerns over traffic congestion and changing social norms have restricted children’s mobility and access to outdoor play spaces, prompting calls from participants for urban spaces that support less structured and more socially enriching play opportunities. Despite such changes, the importance of religious practices and community engagement were found to be constants in shaping children’s daily lives across generations. This study thus deepens understanding of the roles of cultural and religious practices in shaping urban childhood experiences and contributes to the relatively sparse literature on children’s geographies in Asia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian GeographerSame topicChildren's Rights and ParticipationFrench-language works237,207