MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406309168 · doi:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf009

Frailty and osteoporotic fractures represent mutual risks for each other with common physiological backgrounds

2025· article· en· W4406309168 on OpenAlexaff
Tomohiko Urano, Tatsuhiko Kuroda, Mitsuru Saito, Masataka Shiraki

Bibliographic record

VenueJBMR Plus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsHealth Research Foundation
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsOsteoporotic fractureGerontologyMedicineOsteoporosisInternal medicineBone mineral

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Frailty and osteoporosis are known to exacerbate each other. However, limited research is available on the shared pathophysiological factors contributing to osteoporotic fractures and frailty. This study aims to identify common factors associated with both the current frailty and the occurrence of incident vertebral fractures. A total of 912 postmenopausal Japanese women, 63.9 ± 10.0 yr of age (mean ± SD), were included in this study. Each participant’s baseline frailty status was assessed using a questionnaire about the following 5 items: fatigue, resistance, ambulation, inactivity, and weight loss. A score of 3 or above indicated the prevalence of frailty. The participants were then followed up for an average of 10.5 ± 7.5 yr, during which 202 patients suffered incident vertebral fractures. The Cox proportional hazards model for incident vertebral fracture revealed that lumbar bone mineral density (hazard ratio [HR] 0.753, p<.001), adiponectin (HR 1.025, p=.021), log IL-6 (HR 1.227, p=.029), prevalent vertebral fracture (HR 2.124, p<.001), and frailty status (HR 1.355, p=.002) were independent predictors of incident vertebral fractures. The factors associated with frailty status at baseline were assessed using logistic regression analysis, revealing that adiponectin (odds ratio [OR] 1.063, p<.001), log IL-6 (OR 2.94, p<.001), and prevalent vertebral fractures (OR 2.816, p<.001) were significantly associated with current frailty. Biochemical factors such as IL-6 and adiponectin were commonly associated with vertebral fractures and frailty. Additionally, frailty status was identified as an independent risk factor for vertebral fractures, while prevalent vertebral fractures were significantly associated with frailty. These findings clearly indicate that frailty and osteoporotic fractures represent mutual risks for each other, with serum levels of adiponectin and IL-6 serving as common physiological backgrounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJBMR PlusSame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207