MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406322206 · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3528929

Hybrid Optimization for NOMA-Based Transmissive-RIS Mounted UAV Networks

2025· article· en· W4406322206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomaComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsTelecommunications link

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we introduce a novel hybrid joint optimization framework specifically designed for enhancing the performance of consumer electronics in vehicular networks using a transmissive reconfigurable intelligent surface (T-RIS)-mounted uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) system. The UAV employs the non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) protocol to broadcast data to multiple ground devices, ensuring efficient communication. Our primary objective is to maximize the overall system sum rate while adhering to key constraints such as the rate requirements of ground devices, UAV battery capacity, and UAV coordinate boundaries. The optimization challenge of maximizing the system’s sum rate is inherently non-convex and complex. To address this, we decompose the problem into manageable subproblems. The beamforming optimization problem is tackled using successive convex approximation and semi-definite programming techniques, allowing for effective handling of non-convexity. For power allocation, we employ the Lagrangian dual method along with the sub-gradient technique, ensuring optimal power distribution among devices. To optimize the UAV’s location, we propose a dueling-based double deep reinforcement learning (D3RL) framework. This approach effectively combines all computed solutions, resulting in a comprehensive joint optimization strategy. Simulation results highlight the exceptional performance of the proposed framework. Specifically, optimizing the UAV’s location leads to a substantial performance gain of up to 65.9% compared to a system where only beamforming and power allocation are optimized with the UAV positioned at the center of the service area. These findings underscore the potential of our framework in advancing consumer electronics connectivity in vehicular networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it