MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ethical Aspects of Conducting Advertising Campaigns in International Markets

2024· article· en· W4406360282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Тетяна Шуба, Oksana V. Bolotna, Olesia O. Zhuvak

Bibliographic record

VenueBusiness Inform · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessAdvertisingMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this article is to highlight the ethical aspect of conducting advertising campaigns as one of the most important rules in the formation of an advertising campaign and the strategy of the company as a whole. The article defines the aspects, characteristics, features and seven main types of ethical advertising: truthfulness and accuracy of information; ethical use of psychological techniques; social responsibility; protection of vulnerable audiences; ecological responsibility; compliance with legislation and industry standards; privacy and data protection. The scientific works of domestic scholars on the relevant issue are analyzed. Other, no less important aspects that entrepreneurs and marketers should pay attention to when scaling their business when entering a new market in another country are allocated. The importance of this or that type of ethics in marketing, taking into account the peculiarities of countries for conducting an advertising campaign, is indicated. An analysis of two main strategies for entering international markets is carried out, i. e.: standardized and adaptive strategy. Their definitions, pros, cons and features that you should pay attention to when entering foreign markets are presented. The peculiarities of conducting advertising campaigns in three main world markets of economically leading countries are highlighted: Western (USA and Canada), European (EU countries) and Asian (China, Japan and South Korea). Their detailed characterization is given, taking into account ethnic, cultural, political, historical differences and trends to pay attention to. The importance of ethical marketing in modern media is considered, the responsibility of marketers to potential consumers, society, the environment, as well as the influence of advertising on the formation of stereotypes and on culture in general is emphasized. It is noted that buyers, in turn, also influence brands, their values, policies and advertising campaigns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBusiness InformSame topicEthics in Business and EducationFrench-language works237,207