Why Was Small Not Beautiful? Rethinking China’s Great Leap Forward through Water
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Utilizing both ministerial records at the national level and local archival documents from Lankao County, Henan Province, this article examines how small-scale water projects turned into environmental disasters during the Great Leap Forward (1958–62). Previous scholarship has often regarded the Great Leap water policy, namely, the Three Priorities (water storage, small scale, and mass based), as a testimony to the irrationality of Maoist mass mobilization. This article, by contrast, interprets the Maoist technological complex as a troubled marriage between two variants of developmentalism: the high-modernist pursuit of productivism and scientific rationality (water storage) and the Maoist faith in decentralized mass initiatives (small-scale, situated, local projects). The article argues that Maoist water politics were undone by their internal contradictions, because high-modernist centralism undermined populist, revolutionary mass activism—a conflict that extended beyond hydrological engineering and weakened Mao’s revolution as a whole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it