MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406493689 · doi:10.37634/efp.2024.12.2

Legal framework for decarbonization: international, European, and national dimensions

2024· article· en· W4406493689 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomics Finances Law · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper analyzes the global problem of carbon dioxide emissions and their devastating impact on the climate. Decarbonization is examined as a key tool in combating global warming, involving comprehensive measures to reduce emissions across various sectors and the adoption of environmentally friendly energy sources. The authors emphasize the importance of international, European, and national legislation in this area. The provisions of the Paris Agreement, the "Fit for 55" initiative, the "REPowerEU" plan, and several other legal documents are analyzed. Strategies and actions aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions are examined, including more ambitious goals of achieving net-zero emissions, with examples from the EU, Canada, the USA, and other countries. The paper highlights the importance of renewable energy development and economic modernization in the context of transitioning to climate neutrality. It is noted that Ukraine actively adapts its legislative and economic approaches to international standards despite the challenges of wartime. Several international agreements have been ratified, and national legislative frameworks have been developed, including the Laws of Ukraine “On the Basic Principles of State Climate Policy,” “On the Principles of Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, “On Energy Efficiency”, etc. The legal regulation of energy, coal sectors, transport, and budgetary support for innovation is analyzed. The paper concludes that combating global warming requires profound economic and social transformations at all levels—state, business, and citizens. Positive examples of industrial giants implementing environmental initiatives include “ArcelorMittal” and “Eni,” as they adopt new technologies and actively invest in environmentally sustainable production. While technological progress may appear insufficient to achieve ambitious goals, most issues can be resolved through a systematic approach and proactive steps from society as a whole. Carbon emissions present a serious challenge, but countries worldwide are moving toward overcoming it. Fundamental legal documents aimed at decarbonization have already been adopted at the global level within multilateral agreements, though significant improvements are needed. The EU is consistently and comprehensively restructuring its economy toward climate neutrality by adopting legislative acts and taking systematic actions to gradually reduce emissions and move away from a carbon-dependent economy. Despite the war, Ukraine actively participates in international and European efforts by adopting several regulatory acts aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, decreasing the production and consumption of energy-intensive products, increasing the use of alternative energy sources, and preserving natural ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it