MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406518741 · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2025.128067

Influence of graphene functionalization on the curing kinetics, dynamical mechanical properties and morphology of epoxy nanocomposites

2025· article· en· W4406518741 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de PernambucoConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsEpoxyCuring (chemistry)Surface modificationNanocompositeMaterials scienceGrapheneKineticsMorphology (biology)Composite materialPolymer chemistryNanotechnologyChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The properties of graphene have made it a promising material for the development of polymer nanocomposites, and graphene functionalization has gained popularity due to its ability to improve dispersion between the phases. For thermosetting matrices, nanomaterials can affect curing, and rheological studies provide crucial information about this process. This study was undertaken to investigate the impact of graphene functionalization on the curing kinetics and morphology of epoxy nanocomposites. For that, graphene (G), graphene functionalized with surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (G-SDS), graphene oxide (GO), and graphene oxide functionalized with amine groups (GON) were used as nanofillers. Rheological studies showed that the addition of graphene to the resin resulted in a slower curing reaction in comparison to the neat epoxy at temperatures of 60 and 70 °C. G-SDS did not affect the curing kinetics of the epoxy resin, while the addition of GO and GON to the resin accelerated the curing kinetics and reduced the reaction activation energy. The most significant improvements were observed for GON, with a reduction in gelation time at 60 °C from approximately 40 min to 17 min, and at 80 °C from 11 min to 6 min, compared to the neat epoxy. The functionalization also resulted in a significant increase in the dynamic storage (E′) and loss (E″) moduli, indicating that functionalization of graphene enhances its interfacial interaction with the epoxy matrix. Specifically, GON yielded a 70 % increase in E′ and a 28 % increase in E″ compared to the neat epoxy. • GO and GON significantly accelerated epoxy curing reactions. • Amine functionalization improved interaction with epoxy rings. • The longer chain length of DETA likely contributed to an increased reaction rate. • E′ increased by 70 % for GON/E compared to pure epoxy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it