Data Governance for Emerging Technologies: A Conceptual Framework for Managing Blockchain, IoT, and AI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As emerging technologies such as Blockchain, the Internet of Things (IoT), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) continue to reshape industries, the need for robust data governance frameworks has become increasingly critical. These technologies introduce unique challenges, including data privacy concerns, security vulnerabilities, and the complexity of managing vast, decentralized data sets. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for data governance tailored to the specific requirements of Blockchain, IoT, and AI technologies. The framework emphasizes a holistic approach, integrating key governance principles such as transparency, accountability, and compliance with regulatory standards. It also highlights the importance of fostering collaboration between stakeholders, including technologists, legal experts, and policymakers, to create a cohesive governance structure that can adapt to the rapid evolution of these technologies. The proposed framework addresses three core areas: data integrity and quality, security and privacy, and ethical considerations. For Blockchain, the focus is on ensuring the immutability and transparency of records while safeguarding against potential misuse of decentralized data. In the context of IoT, the framework prioritizes the management of data from diverse sources, ensuring interoperability and protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access. For AI, the emphasis is on developing ethical guidelines for data usage, preventing bias in algorithmic decision-making, and maintaining transparency in AI-driven processes. The framework also advocates for the integration of advanced data analytics and machine learning techniques to enhance data governance capabilities, enabling real-time monitoring and predictive insights. Additionally, it underscores the need for continuous training and education for all stakeholders to keep pace with the dynamic nature of emerging technologies. By adopting this comprehensive data governance framework, organizations can mitigate risks, ensure compliance, and harness the full potential of Blockchain, IoT, and AI while maintaining public trust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it