Emerging Trends in Food Process Engineering: Integrating Sensing Technologies for Health, Sustainability, and Consumer Preferences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The food processing industry, a significant global economic driver, encompasses diverse sectors ranging from agriculture to food service and is currently undergoing transformative changes fueled by engineering innovations, evolving consumer preferences, and regulatory demands. Cutting‐edge advancements in food technology, such as precision agriculture, intelligent packaging, and advanced food processing methods like high‐pressure processing and 3D food printing, are revolutionizing efficiency and sustainability. These innovations are reducing waste, improving food safety, and enhancing traceability throughout the supply chain. Simultaneously, consumer demands for healthier, sustainable, and ethically produced food are reshaping product offerings. Emerging trends include functional foods, clean labels, plant‐based diets, personalized nutrition, and allergen‐free products, all reflecting a focus on health and wellness. Sustainability remains a critical priority, with emphasis on eco‐friendly farming practices, food waste reduction, and biodegradable or recyclable packaging solutions. Digital technologies like IoT, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and robotics are enhancing operational efficiency and transparency. Intelligent food packaging featuring embedded sensors for monitoring freshness and quality is further bolstering consumer confidence and supply chain efficiency. These advancements position the food processing industry to address global challenges, ensuring food security, safety, and sustainability while adapting to dynamic market demands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".