MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406616157 · doi:10.3390/ma18020462

Effect of Clamped Member Material and Thickness on Bolt Self-Loosening Under Transverse Loads

2025· article· en· W4406616157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBolted jointStiffnessClampingStructural engineeringFastenerTransverse planeMaterials scienceDisplacement (psychology)Joint stiffnessComposite materialEngineeringFinite element methodMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bolted joints, prevalent in industrial applications for component fastening, are susceptible to self-loosening-a critical issue resulting in a gradual reduction in clamping force. Gaining insight into the underlying mechanisms of self-loosening is crucial. While prior research has largely focused on evaluating component stiffness, limited attention has been given to its impact on the self-loosening behavior of bolted joints under transverse cyclic loading. This study investigates how component stiffness influences self-loosening in bolted joints by varying the material and thickness of clamped members. An experimental setup replicating real-world conditions is devised to simulate loosening caused by cyclic lateral displacement. Tests are conducted using steel and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) clamped members of different grip lengths to explore the relationship between stiffness and self-loosening. Key parameters measured include bolt axial load, transverse force on clamped members, relative displacement, and rotation between the bolt and nut. The findings provide valuable insights into the effects of stiffness across various clamped member materials and grip length combinations, which can enhance the understanding of conditions that promote loosening resistance. Moreover, by highlighting stage-II or rotational loosening, with each test resulting in complete preload loss, the study provides a comparative analysis of the influencing factors. This enables the identification of distinct loosening patterns and supports the development of improved bolted joint designs to reduce loosening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it