MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406650096 · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108272

A probabilistic computational framework for predicting the diagonal tensile strength of unreinforced masonry walls

2025· article· en· W4406650096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Social FundUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaCarleton University
KeywordsUnreinforced masonry buildingDiagonalMasonryUltimate tensile strengthStructural engineeringProbabilistic logicMaterials scienceComputer scienceComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Masonry is a composite construction material consisting of units and mortar. Depending on the adopted computational modeling strategy to perform structural analysis, the composite nature of masonry is either represented via a homogenous continuous medium using averaged material properties, or the morphological features of masonry are addressed explicitly by implementing different levels of details within the discontinuum-based analysis framework. While each modeling approach has its advantages and limitations, the continuum-based approach is commonly used in large-scale simulations, requiring the tensile strength of masonry as an input parameter, which is difficult to obtain due to the complexity of experiments and the high degree of material variability. To this end, the present research proposes a probabilistic computational framework to predict the diagonal tensile strength of URM walls. It explores the tensile strength of masonry composite through computational investigations simulating the diagonal compression tests of small masonry walls based on the discrete element method (DEM). This modeling strategy captures the local failure mechanism at the unit-mortar interfaces and masonry units by representing the masonry as a system of deformable blocks interacting along their boundaries. The validated approach is used to generate a large dataset by considering the material uncertainties that are further utilized to propose predictive equations including bond shear strength under zero vertical pressure and brick (or masonry unit) tensile strength. A potential use of the proposed predictive equations is demonstrated by presenting a simple study where the load-carrying capacity of a masonry wall is estimated using a macro-modeling technique. The results of the discontinuum-based analyses demonstrate good agreement with the available experimental findings presented in the literature. Overall, the results highlight the great potential of the proposed framework to predict the capacity of masonry structures and to complement experimental campaigns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it