MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406714255 · doi:10.32370/ia_2024_04_9

Psychological and Pedagogical Principles for Development of Students’ Musical and Creative Potential in the Pedagogical Colleges

2025· article· en· W4406714255 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Teacher Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMusicalMathematics educationPedagogyVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the study of the psychological and pedagogical foundations for the development of students’ musical and creative potential in the pedagogical colleges. Considered the main components of creative potential, including musical abilities, creativity, emotional sensitivity and the ability to express oneself. Attention is drawn to the need to developing thinking artistically skills in the future teachers, interpreting musical works and performing them meaningfully, which are important in the formation of highly qualified teachers of musical art. In this context, the concept "musical-creative potential" is defined as a complex phenomenon that includes not only the technical skills of playing musical instruments, but also the ability to perceive musical works, imagine their imagery and, on this basis, create one's own performance concept. It is noted that this focus on professional activity requires a special approach to the teaching process for the development of various areas of students' musical and creative potential. In this context, the importance of psychological and pedagogical conditions for the successful formation of students' musical and creative potential in the process of professional training is revealed. The key methods and techniques that contribute to the discovery and development of the musical and creative potential of students in the teaching process of folk instruments playing are identified, in particular, such as interactive teaching methods, the use of modern technologies, and the creation of a creative atmosphere in classes. The importance of taking into account individual characteristics is emphasized, which helps to recognize the creative qualities of each student and promote their discovery in performing activities. The role of motivation and self-esteem in the development of creative potential, as well as the influence of the teacher as a facilitator of students in the direction of the development of their own musical abilities are separately considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.021
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.287
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual ArchiveSame topicEducational Methods and Teacher DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207