MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406729034 · doi:10.23919/emsci.2024.0028

Theory of Periodic Sequence: A Generalized Formalism of Maxwell's Equations in Discrete Transform Domain

2024· article· en· W4406729034 on OpenAlexafffund
Ben You, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueElectromagnetic Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersRoyal SocietyUnion Radio-Scientifique InternationaleRoyal Society of CanadaPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsFormalism (music)Maxwell's equationsMathematical physicsPhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-periodic form or expression is commonly observed in both natural and man-made phenomena across a wide range of scientific and engineering disciplines. In this article, we propose the theory of periodic sequence (TPS), marking the first effort to mathematically formalize Maxwell's equations in the discrete transform domain (corresponding to time domain) and to legitimize the application of the discrete Fourier transform to the temporal aspect of Maxwell's equation. TPS is intended to serve as a comprehensive theory to depict the physical behavior of electromagnetic (EM) periodic sequential fields and waves. Within the TPS framework, periodic-sequential Maxwell's curl equations are decomposed and decoupled to independent and paralleled instances via designated mappings. The fundamental solutions of EM periodic sequential excitation are elucidated and corroborated by radio-frequency (RF)/microwave measurements. This involves potential applications in the analysis of broadband RF transmission and the design of high-speed RF devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectromagnetic ScienceSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207