MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406753418 · doi:10.1016/j.bas.2025.104191

Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of vascular injury and regeneration following experimental Spinal Cord Injury

2025· article· en· W4406753418 on OpenAlexaff
C.J. Entenmann, Emily J. Von Bronewski, Lilly Waldmann, Léa Meyer, Katharina Kersting, Laurens Roolfs, Lasse M Schleker, Melina Nieminen-Kelhä, Irina Kremenetskaia, Frank L. Heppner, Michael G. Fehlings, Peter Vajkoczy, Vanessa Hubertus

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Spine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersBerlin Institute of Health
KeywordsSpinal cord injuryRegeneration (biology)MedicineDynamics (music)Spinal cordNeuroscienceAnesthesiaBiologyPsychologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The loss of vasculature in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) contributes to secondary injury, expanding the injury to unharmed spinal cord (SC) regions. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing therapeutic interventions. Comprehensive analysis of the temporospatial dynamics of vascular injury and regeneration following SCI. Adult C57BL/6J mice were subjected to clip-compression SCI (Th 6/7, 5g, 60s, n = 20) or sham injury (laminectomy, n = 4), and sacrificed at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days (d) post-injury following intracardial fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-Lectin perfusion. Histological analysis (CD31, FITC-Lectin, Ki-67, IgG, TER-119) assessed vascular changes, permeability, and proliferation within the injury epicenter (region 0 (R0), ± 0,5 mm) and two adjacent SC regions (R1: ± 1 mm, R2: ± 2.5 mm). Perfusion loss (FITC-Lectin+/CD31+), was most severe in R0 and R1 at d3 (p < 0.01). Significant vascular loss in R2 started at d3 (p = 0.043). Perfusion was restored at d28 in R0 and R1, and at d7 in R2. Vessel density (CD31 + ) returned to baseline quicker (R0: d3, R1 and R2: d14). Vascular proliferation (CD31+/Ki-67+) manifested across all regions at d3 (p < 0.01), and most notably in R2 (p < 0.01). Vascular permeability for IgG remained disrupted until d3 in R0 and R1 and until d14 in R2. Vascular injury is most severe initially and spreads to the surrounding SC regions. Gradual vascular regeneration occurs early and up to a considerable distance from the injury epicenter, highlighting the potential of early therapeutic interventions targeted at vascular repair and regeneration. • Comprehensive analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of vascular injury and revascularization following Spinal Cord Injury. • Rapid vascular density loss at the injury epicenter by day one with delayed perfusion loss spreading to surrounding areas. • Vascular proliferation in distant regions surmounts regeneration in the injury epicenter, peaking after three days. • The blood-spinal cord barrier is compromised early with a peak on day one at the epicenter and day three in distant regions. • This study highlights the potential of early therapeutic interventions targeted at vascular repair and regeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and SpineSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207