MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406820161 · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104074

Exploring long- and short-term knowledge state graph representations with adaptive fusion for knowledge tracing

2025· article· en· W4406820161 on OpenAlexaff
Guanying Yu, Zhiwen Xie, Guangyou Zhou, Zhuo Zhao, Jimmy Xiangji Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation Processing & Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTerm (time)TracingComputer scienceGraphFusionArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceProgramming languageLinguisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge Tracing (KT) is an important research area in online education that focuses on predicting future academic performance based on students’ historical exercise records. The key to solving the KT problem lies in assessing students’ knowledge states through their responses to concept-related exercises. However, analyzing exercise records from a single perspective does not provide a comprehensive model of student knowledge. The truth is that students’ knowledge states often exhibit long- and short-term phenomena, corresponding to long-term knowledge systems and short-term real-time learning, both of which are closely related to learning quality and preferences. Existing studies have often neglected the learning preferences implied by long-term knowledge states and their impact on student performance. Therefore, we introduce a hybrid knowledge tracing model that utilizes both long- and short-term knowledge state representations (L-SKSKT). It enhances KT by fusing these two types of knowledge state representations and measuring their impact on learning quality. L-SKSKT includes a graph construction method designed to model students’ long- and short-term knowledge states. In addition, L-SKSKT incorporates a knowledge state graph embedding model that can effectively capture long- and short-term dependencies, generating corresponding knowledge state representations. Furthermore, we propose a fusion mechanism to integrate these representations and trace their impact on learning outcomes. Extensive empirical results on four benchmark datasets show that our approach achieves the best performance for KT, and beats various strong baselines with a large margin. • We design a method to transform exercise records into long- and short-term knowledge graphs. • We propose a hierarchical knowledge state graph embedding model with adaptive fusion. • Extensive experiments on four KT datasets show our method outperforms strong baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformation Processing & ManagementSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207