Tungsten erosion during L-mode discharges in the DIII-D SAS-VW divertor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of L-mode plasma discharges was performed in the DIII-D tokamak to assess the impact of outer strike point (OSP) position and toroidal magnetic field direction on erosion and core contamination potential of the recently-installed, tungsten-coated Small Angle Slot (SAS-VW) divertor. In one discharge, in-slot emission spectroscopy measured an <48% increase in the W gross erosion rate when the OSP was moved 3 cm outwards, away from the V-shaped vertex of the slot divertor. However, the effective W yield (erosion rate divided by the incident D flux) was, overall, insensitive to changes in OSP location. Consistently low estimates of the effective W yield based on measurements taken a few cm outwards from the vertex suggest potentially significant C surface contamination. No W emission signal was detected when orienting the toroidal magnetic field such that the ion B×∇B drift direction is pointed away from the X-point. However, measurements of W content in the plasma core for both toroidal magnetic field directions suggest the presence of additional, unmeasured sources of erosion. The difference in the measured core W density with OSP position is much greater than the difference in the measured erosion rates, which may suggest that the leakage of eroded impurities out of the divertor is governed primarily through the parallel ion temperature gradient and friction forces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".