Location estimation for supporting adaptive beamforming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a machine learning (ML)-based localization method for improving location estimation accuracy in wireless networks, especially in challenging environments where traditional techniques often fall short. Conventional methods rely on a limited number of multipath components (MPCs), leading to inaccurate localization in complex environments. By leveraging a novel dataset generated from ray-tracing simulations in urban and campus environments, we propose a deep neural network (DNN)-based method that incorporates rich channel metrics such as angle of arrival (AoA), time of arrival (ToA), and received signal strength (RSS). The DNN is trained on diverse scenarios, including both line-of-sight (LoS) and non-line-of-sight (NLoS) conditions, and outperforms traditional MPC-based methods, reducing localization error by up to 20%. Our approach challenges the conventional use of only 3 MPCs for localization and demonstrates that a larger number of MPCs enhances accuracy, particularly in urban and obstructed environments. This research provides important insights into the potential of ML-driven solutions for improving localization accuracy in next-generation wireless systems , such as 5G and beyond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".