MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406850131 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v16n6p1

Local Entropy Solution of a Convection-Diffusion Type Integro-Differential Equation

2025· article· en· W4406850131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEntropy (arrow of time)Type (biology)Differential equationMathematical analysisThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we prove existence local entropy solution of a convection-diffusion type integro-differential equation \displaystyle \partial_{t}\bigg(k* (j(v)-j(v_{0}))\bigg) - \nabla\cdot\bigg( a(x,\nabla \varphi (v))+ F(\varphi (v))\bigg) = f in $Q_{T}:= (0,T) \times \Omega$ with Dirichlet boundary condition $v(0, \cdot{})= v_{0}$ in $\Omega$ and $L^{1}$-data $f \in L^{1}((0,T)\times \Omega), \ j(v_{0})\in L^{1}(\Omega)$. To that end, regularising the data by $L^{\infty}$-functions, using the existence result of entropy solution for these more approximate data and a comparison and diagonal principle of the regularised entropy solution, we prove the existence of an local entropy solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it