MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406887161 · doi:10.21105/joss.07492

ssdtools v2: An R package to fit Species Sensitivity Distributions

2025· article· en· W4406887161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersMinistry of Environment
KeywordsR packageSensitivity (control systems)MathematicsStatisticsEnvironmental scienceStatistical physicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) are cumulative probability distributions that are used to estimate Hazard Concentrations (HC ) -the concentration of a chemical that is expected to affect a given % of species.HC 5 values, which are intended to protect 95% of species, are often used for the derivation of environmental quality criteria and ecological risk assessment for contaminated ecosystems (Posthuma et al., 2001).The Hazard Proportion (HP ) is the proportion of species affected by a given concentration .ssdtools is an R package (R Core Team, 2024) to fit SSDs using Maximum Likelihood (Millar, 2011) and estimate HC and HP values by model averaging (Schwarz & Tillmanns, 2019) across multiple distributions (Thorley & Schwarz, 2018).The shinyssdtools R package (Dalgarno, 2021) provides a Graphical User Interface to ssdtools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it