MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical analysis and prediction of the effect of debris initial configurations on their dispersion during extreme-hydrodynamic events

2025· article· en· W4406900091 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCoastal Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersEuropean CommissionNvidia
KeywordsDebrisDispersion (optics)MechanicsGeologyDebris flowPhysicsOceanographyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tsunamis and other extreme hydrodynamic events have the potential to transport large debris that, along with the flow, are capable of causing severe damage to coastal structures and infrastructures. Therefore, modelling such processes is essential when assessing the multiple hazards associated to this type of events. In harbour areas, transport inland of shipping containers and subsequent impacts are relevant examples of waterborne debris hazards. The present work addresses two gaps in the scientific research of this problem using numerical methods; the understanding of the effect of containers initial layouts and that of the flow impact angle on the transport and diffusion. To fill these gaps a numerical study was carried out using idealised flow conditions. To this end a Smoothed Particles Hydrodynamics solver (DualSPHysics), coupled with a Discrete Element Method model (Project CHRONO), was used and initially validated with experiments published in the literature. Subsequently, four layouts commonly used in shipping containers yards were simulated, including incident flow depth and impact angle variability, resulting in 76 total simulations. The results were analysed in terms of normalised standard deviation and normalised range differences with respect to the initial values of both parameters. These parameters were related to the flow impact angle, water depth to containers height ratio D h R , and normalised displacement of the container clusters centroids. Standard deviation and range are shown to reach, for almost all results, a quasi-steady state by the end of the simulations. It is shown that the standard deviation and range are more sensitive to the impact angle for D h R ≤ 1 . 7 . In this case, the configurations with flow impacting orthogonally to one of the containers axes show larger values of the two parameters than for intermediate angles. For larger values, D h R drives the standard deviation and range, independently from the impact angle. D h R is shown to be a physical parameter that well describes the relative importance of dispersion and advection of containers transported in extreme hydrodynamic events. Finally, existing relationships, that assume an infinite growth of the range, are shown to overestimate numerical results at the stage in which dispersion does not grow further. Two new regression formulae are numerically derived to predict the dispersion parameters at this stage. They include the effects of the cluster layout, impact angle α and D h R making them a valid alternative to existing relationships. • The effects of layout, flow depth and impact angle on containers dispersion are analysed. • 76 container configurations were simulated with a SPH solver, coupled with a DEM-P solver. • Water Depth to debris height Ratio (DhR) is a relevant parameter to predict debris dispersion. • The influence of impact angle and layout on dispersion is larger for smaller DhR values. • We propose new formulae to predict debris lateral range and standard deviation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it