Protecting Your Attention During Distributed Graph Learning: Efficient Privacy-Preserving Federated Graph Attention Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated graph attention networks (FGATs) are gaining prominence for enabling collaborative and privacy-preserving graph model training. The attention mechanisms in FGATs enhance the focus on crucial graph features for improved graph representation learning while maintaining data decentralization. However, these mechanisms inherently process sensitive information, which is vulnerable to privacy threats like graph reconstruction and attribute inference. Additionally, their role in assigning varying and changing importance to nodes challenges traditional privacy methods to balance privacy and utility across varied node sensitivities effectively. Our study fills this gap by proposing an efficient privacy-preserving FGAT (PFGAT). We present an attention-based dynamic differential privacy (DP) approach via an improved multiplication triplet (IMT). Specifically, we first propose an IMT mechanism that leverages a reusable triplet generation method to efficiently and securely compute the attention mechanism. Second, we employ an attention-based privacy budget that dynamically adjusts privacy levels according to node data significance, optimizing the privacy-utility trade-off. Third, the proposed hybrid neighbor aggregation algorithm tailors DP mechanisms according to the unique characteristics of neighbor nodes, thereby mitigating the adverse impact of DP on graph attention network (GAT) utility. Extensive experiments on benchmarking datasets confirm that PFGAT maintains high efficiency and ensures robust privacy protection against potential threats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".