A kernelized deep regression method to simultaneously predict and normalize displacement responses of long-span bridges via limited synthetic aperture radar images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images retrieved by spaceborne remote sensing have recently gained significant attention as an affordable and effective solution to provide structural responses in terms of displacements from field measurements. Notwithstanding, this process may lead to partial/scattered information due to the limitations of SAR images. Furthermore, the effects of unmeasured environmental and/or operational conditions on structural responses and sensitivity of SAR-extracted displacements of full-scale structures like long-span bridges to these conditions still stand as major challenges. In this work, an innovative machine learning-aided methodology is put forward for handling these issues. The proposed methodology simultaneously predicts and normalizes displacement data within a two-stage kernelized deep regression (KDR) framework. The first stage involves kernelized regressor modeling and selection, exploiting Gaussian process regression and support vector regression. The second stage is based on deep regressor modeling via a long-short-term-memory neural network. The proposed methodology is shown to display high accuracy in prediction limited displacement data independent of unmeasured environmental/operational data. To concretely assess the performance of the proposed methodology, displacement responses from two long-span bridges and seasonal temperature records are considered. Results show that the approach is superior to available state-of-the-art techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it