Museum-Based Art Therapy Program in the Chronic Phase of Stroke: A Feasibility Pilot Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This pilot study evaluated feasibility (retention/adherence) of a 7-visit museum-based art therapy intervention (1-hour guided artworks visit followed by a 2-hour workshop), for 7 chronic stroke survivors and investigated its impact on their psychosocial well-being (depression/self-esteem/body image/community integration). Pre/post-intervention, questionnaires were used to assess the psychological variables and post-intervention, semi-structured individual interviews and a focus group were conducted. The findings showed that the intervention was feasible, with a retention of 77% and adherence of 84%. Participants reported positive effects of the intervention on psychosocial variables such as self-esteem and mood but less so on body image. Clinical implications include initial evidence of the feasibility and potential benefits of a museum-based art therapy intervention in improving post-stroke psychosocial well-being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it