MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407055 · doi:10.1007/bf02428550

A normative theory of organizational control: main and interaction effects of control modes on performance

2010· article· en· W4407055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Information Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormativeControl (management)Context (archaeology)Task (project management)PortfolioOutsourcingComputer scienceFunction (biology)Knowledge managementControl theory (sociology)EconomicsArtificial intelligenceBusinessManagementEpistemologyMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dominant model of organisation control was developed by Ouchi and his colleagues. It predictsthe choice among control modes as a function of the task context. It has two limitations. One is that itpredicts the choice of control modes but not the effect of those choices on performance. The other isthat it restricts that choice to a single control mode for a specific context and does not consider thechoice of a combination or portfolio of control modes, which the same literature frequently describesas practice. Here, contributing to control theory, these two limitations are addressed through thedevelopment of a more complete and complex normative model which includes interactions amongmodes and their effect on performance. This model has important implications for both the theory andpractice of outsourcing, IT project methodology and IT-based organisational transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it