MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407071443 · doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101507

Prediction of drag force on piles subjected to negative skin friction induced by bridge embankment construction based on measured field data

2025· article· en· W4407071443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Geotechnics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersMitacsGovernment of Manitoba
KeywordsDragGeotechnical engineeringParasitic dragLeveeBridge (graph theory)Structural engineeringEngineeringField (mathematics)GeologyForensic engineeringAerospace engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piles are structural elements, transferring the superstructure’s loads to competent layers, through skin friction and end-bearing. Surcharge loads application and following consolidation induce downward movement in the soil adjacent to piles installed in a compressible layer. This movement generates negative skin friction (NSF) that acts downward at the pile-soil interface, resulting in an additional axial force added to the shaft and excessive pile settlement known as drag force (DF) and downdrag (DD), respectively. This study aims to evaluate the mobilized DF on a driven H-pile installed in clay till using three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis. The numerical model was validated against field data from an instrumented H-pile as part of a two-span bridge (Daly Overpass) on PTH10 in Manitoba, Canada. The calculated axial force and water total head indicated good agreement with the measured field data. Parametric analyses examined the effects of pile cross-sectional area, length, material, and applied pile head load magnitude on DF. Results showed that DF and DD values differ for piles within the cap, depending on the geometry and direction of the load application on the piles. For this project’s geometry, the maximum axial force (MAF) applied on the pile due to the embankment construction and following consolidation for the most critical pile location can reach approximately 27 % of the pile total capacity measured at the end of initial driving. Additionally, the DF and DD at the most critical pile location were 25 % and 37.5 % higher than the least critical pile scenario, respectively. Increasing the pile’s cross-sectional area and length led to an increase in DF and a downward shift of the neutral plane (NP). However, increasing the applied dead load on the pile reduced the DF and caused the NP to shift upward toward the pile head. Additionally, more DF was generated along the steel pile compared to the concrete pile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it