MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407121222 · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/adb23f

Forecasting the electricity usage in single-family housings of a case study via kho-kho optimization algorithm

2025· article· en· W4407121222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Research Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityAlgorithmComputer scienceOptimization algorithmMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nowadays, the consumption of energy has increased on an unprecedented scale, so it is of primary importance to forecast energy use via designing energy usage simulation systems. The challenge of energy management within buildings can have implications for energy management at a broader scale (national power grid). Furthermore, the application of various algorithms may enhance the comprehension of these dynamics. In this paper, a kho-kho-based Optimization Algorithm Numerical Moment Matching (kho-kho-NMM) method is employed for predicting the electricity usage in a set of single-family dwellings using the key features. Hence, for the residences that illustrate the systematic characteristics of the database, a group of indices including their correlated weights is obtained. The DesignBuilder software is used for developing the modeling of energy. By integrating these procedures, the buildings’ energy performance is evaluated in a case study, Toronto in Iowa. This method is able to be employed for making a small set of usual dwellings in order to demonstrate the energy performance in a far larger set of residences. A significant aspect of this research is its concentrated examination of private housing databases, positing that there are fundamental differences in energy consumption behaviors between residential and commercial structures. This can lead to identifying systematic relationships and reduces the complexity of calculations by focusing on a limited set of specialized housing types for energy behavior analysis within extensive datasets. The outcomes depict that the forecasted electricity usage within a year is 10,315 kWh being in 4% of the experimental data. What is more, the mean bias error (MBE) of the forecasted electricity usage over a month is 2.2% and the Deviation Constant with residuals (the Root Mean Square Error (DC-RMSE)) is 10.6%. Overall, the research findings can result in achieving a a methodology under virtually less calculation that can result in the outcomes’ conserved efficacy whenever the computing period and cost are decreasing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it