Advancements in Interoperability: Achieving Anatomic Pathology Reports That Adhere to International Standards and Are Both Human-Readable and Readily Computable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Over the past 50 years, multiple pathology organizations worldwide have evolved in cancer histopathology reporting from subjective, narrative assessments to structured, synoptic formats using controlled vocabulary. These reporting protocols include the required data elements that represent the minimum set of evidence-based, clinically actionable parameters necessary to convey the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information essential for patient care. Despite these advances, the synoptic reporting protocols were not harmonized across the various pathology organizations. Cancer pathology continues to be widely reported and stored in free-text format, or without encoded data such that it is neither computable nor interoperable across organizations. METHODS: In 2020, SNOMED International created the Cancer Synoptic Reporting Working Group (CSRWG). This resulted in international collaboration across multiple pathology organizations. CCRWG's mission was to use SNOMED Clinical Terms (CT) concepts to represent the required content within the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) published pathology reporting protocols. RESULTS: In late 2023, the CSRWG published over 1,300 new or revised SNOMED CT concepts to represent all required pathology cancer data elements for adult and pediatric solid tumors in both CAP and ICCR using the semantic principles of the SNOMED-CT concept model. Thus, computability and interoperability would be broadly established. CONCLUSION: This work brings to fruition the longstanding desire for an international, interoperable, human- and machine-readable cancer pathology report for use in patient care, health care quality improvement, population health, public health surveillance, and translational and clinical trial research. The following report describes the project, its methods, and applications in the stated use cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.200 | 0.298 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.044 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.025 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".