MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407164896 · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103210

MapReduce based big data framework using associative Kruskal poly Kernel classifier for diabetic disease prediction

2025· article· en· W4407164896 on OpenAlexaff
R. Ramani, S. Edwin Raja, D. Dhinakaran, S. Jagan, G. Prabaharan

Bibliographic record

VenueMethodsX · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAssociative propertyKernel (algebra)Big dataClassifier (UML)Pattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningData miningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent trendy applications of Artificial Intelligence are Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, which have been extensively utilized for processes like pattern recognition, object classification, effective prediction of disease etc. However, ML techniques are reasonable solutions to computation methods and modeling, especially when the data size is enormous. These facts are established due to the reason that big data field has received considerable attention from both the industrial experts and academicians. The computation process must be accelerated to achieve early disease prediction in order to accomplish the prospects of ML for big data applications. In this paper, a method named "Associative Kruskal Wallis and MapReduce Poly Kernel (AKW-MRPK)" is presented for early disease prediction. Initially, significant attributes are selected by applying Associative Kruskal Wallis Feature Selection model. This study parallelizes polynomial kernel vector using MapReduce based on the significant qualities gained, which will become a significant computing model to facilitate the early prognosis of disease. The proposed AKW-MRPK framework achieves up to 92 % accuracy, reduces computational time to as low as 0.875 ms for 25 patients, and demonstrates superior speedup efficiency with a value of 1.9 ms using two computational nodes, consistently outperforming supervised machine learning algorithms and Hadoop-based clusters across these critical metrics.•The AKW-MRPK method selects attributes and accelerates computations for predictions.•Parallelizing polynomial kernels improves accuracy and speed in healthcare data analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.553
GPT teacher head0.592
Teacher spread0.039 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethodsXSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207