MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407193566 · doi:10.3390/geomatics5010009

Advances in Remote Sensing and Deep Learning in Coastal Boundary Extraction for Erosion Monitoring

2025· article· en· W4407193566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRemote sensingComputer scienceDeep learningCoastal erosionContext (archaeology)Vulnerability (computing)ErosionEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erosion is a critical geological process that degrades soil and poses significant risks to human settlements and natural habitats. As climate change intensifies, effective coastal erosion management and prevention have become essential for our society and the health of our planet. Given the vast extent of coastal areas, erosion management efforts must prioritize the most vulnerable and critical regions. Identifying and prioritizing these areas is a complex task that requires the accurate monitoring and forecasting of erosion and its potential impacts. Various tools and techniques have been proposed to assess the risks, impacts and rates of coastal erosion. Specialized methods, such as the Coastal Vulnerability Index, have been specifically designed to evaluate the susceptibility of coastal areas to erosion. Coastal boundaries, a critical factor in coastal erosion monitoring, are typically extracted from remote sensing images. Due to the extensive scale of coastal areas and the complexity of the data, manually extracting coastal boundaries is challenging. Recently, artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning, has emerged as a promising and essential tool for this task. This review provides an in-depth analysis of remote sensing and deep learning for extracting coastal boundaries to assist in erosion monitoring. Various remote sensing imaging modalities (optical, thermal, radar), platforms (satellites, drones) and datasets are first presented to provide the context for this field. Artificial intelligence and its associated metrics are then discussed, followed by an exploration of deep learning algorithms for extracting coastal boundaries. The presented algorithms range from basic convolutional networks to encoder–decoder architectures and attention mechanisms. An overview of how these extracted boundaries and other deep learning algorithms can be utilized for monitoring coastal erosion is also provided. Finally, the current gaps, limitations and potential future directions in this field are identified. This review aims to offer critical insights into the future of erosion monitoring and management through deep learning-based boundary extraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it