MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407261680 · doi:10.1186/s12938-025-01347-y

The effect of depth data and upper limb impairment on lightweight monocular RGB human pose estimation models

2025· article· en· W4407261680 on OpenAlexafffund
Gloria-Edith Boudreault-Morales, César Márquez-Chin, Xilin Liu, José Zariffa

Bibliographic record

VenueBioMedical Engineering OnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMonocularComputer sciencePoseRGB color modelEstimationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Markerless vision-based human pose estimation (HPE) is a promising avenue towards scalable data collection in rehabilitation. Deploying this technology will require self-contained systems able to process data efficiently and accurately. The aims of this work are to (1) Determine how depth data affects lightweight monocular red-green-blue (RGB) HPE performance (accuracy and speed), to inform sensor selection and (2) Validate HPE models using data from individuals with physical impairments. METHODS: Two HPE models were investigated: Dite-HRNet and MobileHumanPose (capable of 2D and 3D HPE, respectively). The models were modified to include depth data as an input using three different fusion techniques: an early fusion method, a simple intermediate fusion method (using concatenation), and a complex intermediate fusion method (using specific fusion blocks, additional convolutional layers, and concatenation). All fusion techniques used RGB-D data, in contrast to the original models which only used RGB data. The models were trained, validated and tested using the CMU Panoptic and Human3.6 M data sets as well as a custom data set. The custom data set includes RGB-D and optical motion capture data of 15 uninjured and 12 post-stroke individuals, while they performed movements involving their upper limbs. HPE model performances were monitored through accuracy and computational efficiency. Evaluation metrics include Mean per Joint Position Error (MPJPE), Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) and frame rates (frames per second). RESULTS: The early fusion architecture consistently delivered the lowest MPJPE in both 2D and 3D HPE cases while achieving similar FLOPs and frame rates to its RGB counterpart. These results were consistent regardless of the data used for training and testing the HPE models. Comparisons between the uninjured and stroke groups did not reveal a significant effect (all p values > 0.36) of motor impairment on the accuracy of any model. CONCLUSIONS: Including depth data using an early fusion architecture improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off of the HPE model. HPE accuracy is not affected by the presence of physical impairments. These results suggest that using depth data with RGB data is beneficial to HPE, and that models trained with data collected from uninjured individuals can generalize to persons with physical impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioMedical Engineering OnLineSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207