MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407285672 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwae059.198

A198 BIO-EXPERIENCED ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS REQUIRING ADMISSION HAVE A TWO-FOLD RISK OF COLECTOMY AS COMPARED TO BIO-NAÏVE PATIENTS

2025· article· en· W4407285672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisColectomyMedicineFold (higher-order function)GastroenterologyInternal medicineGeneral surgeryDiseaseComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Admission rates for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are decreasing, however patients admitted with a UC flare are at increased risk of colectomy. In recent years, numerous advanced therapies have emerged to treat flares and maintain remission. Many patients are now “bio-experienced”, defined as prior/current exposure to at least one advanced therapy. In flare management, colectomy is reserved for patients with severe or refractory disease, or to manage complications such as toxic megacolon or perforation. It is not known if a patient’s bio-exposure status (i.e. bio-experienced or bio-naive) affects their risk of requiring a colectomy when they are hospitalized for a UC flare. Such information is important to clinicians when choosing to initiate therapy, determining the timing of therapy escalation and allowing patients to understand their risk to make informed treatment decisions. Aims To assess the relative risk of 90-day colectomy in bio-experienced versus bio-naïve patients admitted to hospital with UC flare as well as secondary outcomes such as time to first advanced therapy in hospital and length of stay (LOS). Methods This is a single centre retrospective cohort study that included patients admitted with a diagnosis of UC flare to a major tertiary hospital in Edmonton, AB from Nov 2019 to Apr 2024. The cohort was designated as bio-naïve, having never received advanced therapies or bio-experienced, having received at least one advanced therapy prior to admission. Administrative data extraction and chart review was used to obtain the primary and secondary outcomes. Relative risk of colectomy was calculated between groups and a 95% confidence interval generated for this. The secondary outcomes were analyzed using an unpaired t-test with the significance level of p<0.05. For LOS with colectomy, given significant variance, median and IQR were reported instead. Results In total, there were 216 admissions; 87 patients were bio-experienced and 129 were bio-naïve at the time of admission. Twenty-six patients underwent colectomy within 90 days. Of the patients who were bio-experienced, 18.39% underwent colectomy compared to 7.75% in the bio-naïve group. The relative risk of 90-day colectomy in the bio-experienced compared to bio-naïve patients was 2.37 (1.13-4.98 95% CI). Secondary outcomes showed similar average length of stay, however bio-experienced patients were placed on advanced therapy sooner and those requiring colectomy had shortened LOS, compared to bio-naïve patients (Figure 1). Chart review for other secondary outcomes (eg. prior therapies, disease duration) is underway. Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, we demonstrated that the relative risk of colectomy for UC patients admitted with flare is 2.3 fold higher in bio-experienced compared to bio-naïve patients. Figure 1 Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it