Local Birkhoff decompositions for loop groups and a finiteness result
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Let <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>𝐆</m:mi> </m:math> {\mathbf{G}} denote an affine Kac–Moody group, and G its points over the local field <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>𝔽</m:mi> <m:mi>q</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {\mathbb{F}_{q}((s))} . We establish a local Birkhoff decomposition for a subset of G in terms of a pair of subgroups roughly of the form <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>𝐆</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>𝔽</m:mi> <m:mi>q</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">[</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">[</m:mo> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">]</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">]</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{F}_{q}[[s]])} and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>𝐆</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>𝔽</m:mi> <m:mi>q</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">[</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mo stretchy="false">]</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{F}_{q}[s^{-1}])} . Our techniques are global-to-local and use the reduction theory for loop groups due to H. Garland. Building on these ideas, we establish the finiteness of a set whose cardinality is related to spherical R -polynomials in D. Muthiah’s conjectural double-affine Kazhdan–Lusztig theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it