Exploring the Roots of Small and Medium Enterprise Financing Issues in Myanmar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Financial constraints are one of the top significant barriers for the growth and survivals of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This study focuses on the causes of the SME financing issues in Myanmar before the covid-19 period from both demand side (SMEs) and supply side (banks). The study conducts a comparative analysis of SME financing between Myanmar and other ASEAN countries, as well as that of SMEs in comparison to large enterprises (LEs) within Myanmar. It utilizes firm-level data from the World Bank’s Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (2014-2017) and country-level financial data from the Global Financial Development Database and Doing Business Survey (2010-2019) across eight ASEAN countries. The findings reveal that both Myanmar’s SMEs and its banking sector have internal weaknesses that hinder SME financing. Myanmar’s SMEs show weaknesses in key areas such as information and communication technology (ICT) skills, the use of audited financial statements, and export capabilities. Despite these shortcomings, Myanmar SMEs, particularly in the manufacturing sector, demonstrate growth potential in employment and innovation, like ASEAN SMEs. On the supply side, Myanmar’s banking sector shows inefficiencies, including high market concentration, low market stability, limited credit creation, and weak contract enforcement. These factors exacerbate collateral requirements for SMEs, further impeding their access to bank loans. As a results, Myanmar’s SMEs face more serious collateral challenges and lower financing opportunities than their ASEAN counterparts. To improve SME financing in Myanmar, policies must address the weaknesses on both the demand and supply sides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it