MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407572029 · doi:10.52041/iase2023.504

learnr modules for self-paced learning of linear regression concepts

2024· article· en· W4407572029 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsComputer scienceLinear regressionArtificial intelligenceRegressionMachine learningStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Methods of Data Analysis 1 course at the University of Toronto is a theoretical and applied presentation of linear regression with a heavy emphasis on the use of the R statistical software. Prerequisite competence in inference and R programming vary dramatically, causing many students to struggle with new material. To address this disparity, learnR modules were developed for five course topics to provide guided practice in programming and review of relevant prerequisite topics. The modules further present new course concepts commonly misunderstood in an exploratory manner prior to formal introduction in class. The goal of these modules is to create opportunities for low-stakes R practice, review of concepts needed to build further notions in the course, and to develop an intuitive understanding of the theory and core concepts of linear regression. We anticipate students will gain confidence in the necessary skills to be successful in the course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it