MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407626282 · doi:10.1080/01419870.2024.2446487

Policing the surplus crisis, carceral racism and abolitionist resistance in Germany

2025· article· en· W4407626282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnic and Racial Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolicing Practices and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismResistance (ecology)CriminologySociologyAnti-racismPolitical scienceGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last decades, state violence has intensified in various European countries. Police powers, as well as repressive migration regimes, have massively expanded, and moral panics that center on the “criminality” of migrants and racialized youth are recurring. At the center of this condition lies the racialized figure of migration as well as the category of surplus. This article discusses two examples of the carceral condition in Germany: Police killings and related forms of policing, described by many activists in Germany as the “police problem”; and the moral urban panic around “clan criminality”. These two sides of policing are characterized by a specific form of racism. I define this form of racism as carceral racism. The contribution of this article is twofold: It provides an analysis of (1) two dominant forms of policing in Germany and (2) a new paradigm of racism that is shaped by the carceral condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it