MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407626282 · doi:10.1080/01419870.2024.2446487

Policing the surplus crisis, carceral racism and abolitionist resistance in Germany

2025· article· en· W4407626282 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa E. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnic and Racial Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolicing Practices and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismResistance (ecology)CriminologySociologyAnti-racismPolitical scienceGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last decades, state violence has intensified in various European countries. Police powers, as well as repressive migration regimes, have massively expanded, and moral panics that center on the “criminality” of migrants and racialized youth are recurring. At the center of this condition lies the racialized figure of migration as well as the category of surplus. This article discusses two examples of the carceral condition in Germany: Police killings and related forms of policing, described by many activists in Germany as the “police problem”; and the moral urban panic around “clan criminality”. These two sides of policing are characterized by a specific form of racism. I define this form of racism as carceral racism. The contribution of this article is twofold: It provides an analysis of (1) two dominant forms of policing in Germany and (2) a new paradigm of racism that is shaped by the carceral condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnic and Racial StudiesSame topicPolicing Practices and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207