MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ЗАРУБІЖНИЙ ДОСВІД ФОРМУВАННЯ ЦИФРОВОЇ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТІ МАЙБУТНІХ МЕНЕДЖЕРІВ

2025· article· en· W4407704564 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUkrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article systematizes different approaches to the interpretation of the concept of «digital competence of future managers», depending on the context and scope of application: competence approach, pedagogical, information and communication, integration, system, analytical and ethical approaches. The main focus of the article is on the features of the formation of digital competence of future managers in different countries. A comparative analysis of the approaches used in Great Britain, Germany, the USA, Finland, Sweden and Canada was carried out. Domestic universities are emphasizing the use of digital platforms for online courses and practical assignments. Germany focuses on digital management, innovation and the integration of modern technologies into business practices. MBA programs in the USA include studying Data Science, IT management and digital strategies for leaders. Finland offers courses in digital platforms, data analytics and innovation management. Sweden focuses on digital marketing and real business case studies. In Canada, educational programs focus on digital governance, blockchain technologies and data analysis. In addition, the article determines that the application of foreign experience in the formation of digital competence in Ukraine will contribute to positive dynamics in this issue. In particular, domestic universities will be able to borrow the use of digital platforms for learning by integrating platforms for online courses, such as FutureLearn, or by creating their own national counterparts. It has also been determined that the German approach to integrating IoT, AI and Big Data into curricula can be adapted through the creation of disciplines based on current business technologies. At the same time, the Canadian experience can be useful for creating training programs in blockchain technologies and data analysis, which will allow future managers to work with modern financial and management tools. Accordingly, the Swedish approach to using real cases (for example, from Spotify or Ericsson) can be implemented through the partnership of Ukrainian universities with leading local and international companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it