MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407732242 · doi:10.1186/s42466-025-00365-4

No disadvantages for women in acute stroke care in Germany: an analysis of access to stroke treatment services in Germany from 2017 to 2022

2025· article· en· W4407732242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurological Research and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersUniversitätsklinikum Heidelberg
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Atrial fibrillationThrombolysisDisadvantageCohortAcute strokeRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsEmergency medicineInternal medicineTissue plasminogen activatorMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Several publications have raised concerns that female stroke patients may be at a disadvantage when accessing stroke treatment services. These publications have found significant regional differences in the provision of stroke treatment to male and female patients. In this study, we provide current nationwide data on stroke management differences between men and women in Germany. METHODS: This large retrospective cohort study used national datasets from the German Federal Statistical Office for 2017-2022. We examined differences between female and male stroke patients in terms of case volume, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MTE), stroke unit (SU) treatment, intrahospital mortality, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). RESULTS: Data from more than 1.3 million hospitalised stroke patients were included. Forty-seven percent of the patients were female. Female patients were older and more frequently ≥ 80 years old (50.3% versus 29.4%). Rates of IVT (16.3% versus 16.3%) were similar for both sexes but higher in females when adjusted for age. MTE rates (8.2% versus 6.3%) were consistently higher in female patients across all age groups. Female patients had higher rates of intrahospital mortality (9.1% versus 6.2%), and admission to SUs (73.6% versus 76.0%) was less common. Treatment rates in intensive care units were similar (10.6% versus 10.5%). AF, a surrogate for embolic (and more severe) strokes, was more prevalent in females (32.6% versus 25.4%). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that female stroke patients in Germany face any disadvantage in accessing stroke treatment services. Acute stroke treatment rates were generally similar or higher when compared to males. Higher intrahospital mortality and lower SU rates were attributed to greater age, comorbidities, and stroke severity. However, the differences were not fully explained when adjusting for AF and age. Further research is needed on sex differences in stroke mechanisms and outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it