MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407849306 · doi:10.1016/j.gerr.2025.100119

Enhanced prediction of heating value of municipal solid waste using hybrid neuro-fuzzy model and decision tree-based feature importance assessment

2025· article· en· W4407849306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Energy and Resources · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSmart Systems and Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsGeorge Brown College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecision treeFeature (linguistics)Municipal solid wasteTree (set theory)Value (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceNeuro-fuzzyFuzzy logicComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMachine learningWaste managementMathematicsEngineeringFuzzy control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes a hybrid network of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with genetic algorithm (GA) to predict the higher heating value (HHV) of municipal solid waste (MSW). To enhance the robustness and accuracy of the model and optimize its ability to capture the complex non-linear relationship in the MSW dataset, eight membership functions (MF)-type of the grid partitioning (GP) clustering approach were tested. Moreover, understanding the relative importance and contribution of different waste properties to HHV prediction is critical for improving the model's predictive capability and optimizing the waste-to-energy (WTE) process. To this end, the feature importance analysis of MSW input variables was carried out using the decision tree regressor with the Gini importance (GI) metrics to identify the most influential variable. Key waste properties, including ultimate analysis data, ash and moisture content were used as input variables for the model. The result shows that the GP-clustered GA-ANFIS model based on triangular-shaped MF-type (tri-MF) has the most accurate HHV predictions with Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) values of 0.7642, 13.677, 1.5913 and 0.9821 at the training and 0.6364, 16.216, 1.2437 and 0.7821 at the testing stage. Feature importance assessment revealed ash content as the most important predictor of HHV based on GI-value of 0.519668 (about 50% cumulative importance). Additionally, sulphur and nitrogen, along with ash content, dominated the HHV prediction and exhibited the highest predictive power on HHV with about 80% cumulative importance. The robust integrated approach of hybrid neuro-fuzzy model, with decision tree-based feature importance assessment, offers an effective approach for enhancing the prediction of HHV of MSW. The outcome of the study enhances WTE systems, facilitating more efficient and sustainable energy recovery from MSW. • Neuro-fuzzy model with feature importance analysis offers a robust HHV estimation. • GP-clustered ANFIS-GA outperformed standalone-ANFIS and LMBP-ANN for HHV prediction. • ANFIS-GA-GP with tri-MF predicted HHV with RMSE values of 1.2437 at the testing. • Ash content with Gini importance of 0.5196 is the highest predictor of HHV of MSW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it