Single-Axis Solar Tracking Systems: A Comprehensive Design and Performance Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abundant solar resources and increasing electricity demand make solar energy a promising renewable energy source in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, conventional stationary Photovoltaic (PV) systems face challenges in efficiently capturing solar irradiation. To address this limitation, the implementation of solar tracking systems becomes essential, as they optimize the energy output of PV systems by dynamically adjusting the orientation of the panels to align with the sun’s rays. This study presents a comprehensive design and performance evaluation of single-axis solar tracking systems in Delta State, Nigeria. The investigation focused on the energy provision efficiency of these systems, revealing that the single-axis tracker reached peak performance at year-end, providing 9.333 kWh of available solar energy and 9.296 kWh of user-available energy. Over the year, the system delivered a total of 100.625 kWh of available solar energy and 96.483 kWh of user-available energy. These findings highlight the significant role of solar tracking systems in maximizing energy harvest and underscore their potential for improving energy sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".