MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407952144 · doi:10.31181/sa21202417

Artificial General-Internet of Things (AG-IOT) for Robotics of Automation

2024· article· en· W4407952144 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSystemic Analytics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsRoboticsAutomationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceEngineeringEmbedded systemRobotMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of the Internet of Things (IoT) is quickly developing and influencing new advancements in a variety of application domains, including the Internet of Mobile Things (IoMT), Autonomous Internet of Things (A-IoT), and the Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT), among others. The IoT influence presents new design and implementation challenges in various fields, including seamless platform integration, context-based cognitive network integration, new mobile sensor/actuator network paradigms, and architectural domains for smart farming, infrastructure, healthcare, agriculture, business, and commerce. Applications for automation in the IoRT are numerous and are developing quickly. IoRT blends the strength of robots and the IoT, resulting in creative solutions for a range of sectors. As we ensure the authenticity of the content in this introduction, we shall investigate the wide range of IoRT automation applications. IoRT automation refers to a broad range of endeavors that use connected gadgets, sensors, and autonomous machinery to improve production, efficiency, and safety across various industries. These regions are general categories into which these programs can be placed; Industry 4.0 and manufacturing, IoRT enables automated manufacturing where robots and IoT gadgets work together without issues. While sensors keep an eye on the condition of the equipment and improve manufacturing processes, robots can carry out activities like assembly, quality checking, and material handling. Medical field: IoRT automates procedures, including surgery, patient surveillance, and drug delivery, increasing accuracy and lowering human error. Robotic prostheses and exoskeletons improve rehabilitation and mobility. Agriculture: IoRT supports precision farming by using robots and drones that can operate autonomously to check crop health, administer pesticides, and harvest crops. Decisions are made more accessible by real-time sensor data on weather and soil conditions. Logistics and warehousing: By autonomously moving items and improving inventory management, Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) and robots optimize warehouse operations. IoRT helps to manage traffic, monitor air quality, and enhance public safety in smart cities by utilizing autonomous cars and advanced infrastructure. Retail: IoRT improves customer experiences in the retail industry with autonomous grocery carts, robotic inventory managers, and data-driven targeted marketing. Environmental Tracking: IoRT devices gather information in hazardous or remote locations, such as monitoring ocean pollution levels or harshly weathering infrastructure inspections. Power and utilities: IoRT uses robotic inspections and proactive maintenance to help maintain electric grids, pipelines, and projects involving renewable energy. Education and Exploration: IoRT is helpful for research and education since it enables scientists and students to experiment remotely with robotic systems and learn more about automation technology. Home automation: IoRT equipment is increasingly integrated into smart homes to provide security and convenience through linked appliances, security cameras, and personal assistants. As technology develops, the range of IoRT automated applications also keeps growing. It can transform industries, enhance the standard of life, and tackle challenging problems. This overview offers a glimpse into the intriguing and diverse world of IoRT automation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystemic AnalyticsSame topicRobotics and Automated SystemsFrench-language works237,207