Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article outlines a psychoanalytic political ecology that sees both nature and the subject as fundamentally ruptured, rendering it impossible to forge stable human-environmental relationships. It thus stands in opposition to those strands of political ecology (i.e., “environmentalism of the poor” and decolonial “futurality”) that fall back on romanticized notions of reconciliation with nature-culture. Focusing on a case study from the Colombian Pacific, the article critically examines a politics of conservation that, by seeking a coherent nature in the same way that some variants of political ecology tend to do, ends up helping to reproduce capitalist accumulation, while also dispossessing and/or depoliticizing the subaltern. Instead, the article presents a (negative) psychoanalytic political ecology that is thoroughly politicized, one which seeks to address nature's absence rather than overlooking it, and one that emphasizes those most impacted by crisis and instability—the subaltern—rather than taking their struggles for granted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it