MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408028401 · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109567

PyFR v2.0.3: Towards industrial adoption of scale-resolving simulations

2025· article· en· W4408028401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Physics Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicScientific Research and Discoveries
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryInnovate UKOffice of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionJapan Society for the Promotion of Science LondonAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchJapan Science and Technology AgencyEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilLeverhulme TrustU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsScale (ratio)Statistical physicsEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceComputational sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PyFR is an open-source cross-platform computational fluid dynamics framework based on the high-order Flux Reconstruction approach, specifically designed for undertaking high-accuracy scale-resolving simulations in the vicinity of complex engineering geometries. Since the initial release of PyFR v0.1.0 in 2013, a range of new capabilities have been added to the framework, with a view to enabling industrial adoption. In this work, we provide details of these enhancements as released in PyFR v2.0.3, including improvements to cross-platform performance (new backends, extensions of the DSL, new matrix multiplication providers, improvements to the data layout, use of task graphs) and improvements to numerical stability (modal filtering, anti-aliasing, artificial viscosity , entropy filtering), as well as the addition of prismatic, tetrahedral and pyramid shaped elements, improved domain decomposition support for mixed element grids, improved handling of curved element meshes, the addition of an adaptive time-stepping capability, the addition of incompressible Euler and Navier-Stokes solvers, improvements to file formats and the development of a plugin architecture. We also explain efforts to grow an engaged developer and user community and provided a range of examples that show how our user base is applying PyFR to solve a wide range of fundamental, applied and industrial flow problems. Finally, we demonstrate the accuracy of PyFR v2.0.3 for a supersonic Taylor-Green vortex case, with shocks and turbulence, and provided latest performance and scaling results on up to 1024 AMD Instinct MI250X accelerators of Frontier at ORNL (each with two GCDs) and up to 2048 Nvidia GH200 GPUs of Alps at CSCS. We note that absolute performance of PyFR accounting for the totality of both hardware and software improvements has, conservatively, increased by almost 50× over the last decade. Program summary Program Title: PyFR CPC Library link to program files: https://doi.org/10.17632/vmgh4kfjk6.1 Developer's repository link: https://github.com/PyFR/PyFR Licensing provisions: BSD 3-clause Programming language: Python (generating C/OpenMP, CUDA, OpenCL, HIP , Metal) Nature of problem: Accurate and efficient scale-resolving simulation of industrial flows. Solution method: Massively parallel cross-platform implementation of high-order accurate Flux Reconstruction schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it