MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408078387 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103486

EmoLand: Utilizing narrative animations, multilevel games, and affective computing to foster emotional development in children with autism spectrum disorder

2025· article· en· W4408078387 on OpenAlexaff
Min Fan, Sheng Jin, Jianyu Fan, Wenchen Guo, Xu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersBeijing Nova Program
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderNarrativePsychologyAutismDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• We designed an interactive system that utilizes narrative animations, multilevel games, and affective computing to support children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) learning neurotypical emotions and facial expressions in social contexts. • Children with ASD achieved generalized learning gains in recognizing and producing neurotypical facial expressions. • The three-step design approach is feasible for developing interactive AI systems for children with ASD. • Narrative animations provide value social contexts, while multilevel games and interactivity help children to stay focused. • Blending AI and human support enables children's personalized, engaging, and effective learning. Emotional skills are crucial for a child's success, though children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) face challenges in understanding social contexts, as well as recognizing and expressing facial expressions. We present EmoLand, a web-based interactive system that utilizes narrative animations, multilevel games, and artificial intelligence (AI) affective computing to instruct children with ASD about neurotypical emotions and facial expressions in social contexts. The paper sets out the iterative design process used, which was informed by ASD intervention theories, empirical studies focused on children with ASD and their educators (tutors, therapists, parents), and multiple discipline expert inputs. A preliminary evaluation involving twelve children with ASD (aged 4 to 7 years) and five tutors suggests that EmoLand is a viable teaching aid for ASD educators and effectively assists children in learning and applying generalized knowledge about emotions and facial expressions. In this paper, we discuss the design approach and key lessons learned for creating interactive AI systems for children with ASD and explore beneficial considerations for enhancing emotional development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Human-Computer StudiesSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207