MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408080385 · doi:10.1016/j.cpsurg.2025.101740

Correlation study of kinesiophobia and functional rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty

2025· article· en· W4408080385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wei Dong, Yang Wang, Zhineng Chen, Liang Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Problems in Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArthroplastyRehabilitationTotal knee arthroplastyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgical intervention for end-stage osteoarthritis, but patients often experience kinesiophobia after surgery, which may significantly impact their functional rehabilitation process. Kinesiophobia refers to an irrational fear of movement or re-injury, potentially leading to reduced activity, delayed recovery, and ultimately affecting the surgical treatment outcomes. Currently, systematic studies on the impact of kinesiophobia on functional rehabilitation after knee replacement remain limited. This retrospective cohort study reviewed the clinical data of 180 patients who underwent unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty at a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and December 2024 through the electronic medical record system. Patient kinesiophobia levels were assessed using the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS), and follow-up data from the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were collected. The study analyzed patients' functional rehabilitation at 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery, exploring the correlation between kinesiophobia and functional rehabilitation indicators. The study findings revealed a significant negative correlation between patients' kinesiophobia levels and functional rehabilitation status. Analysis of clinical data from 180 patients showed that those with higher TKS scores performed worse on WOMAC functional scores and SPPB tests. Specifically, patients with severe kinesiophobia (TKS score >40) demonstrated significantly lower joint range of motion, walking ability, and daily living activity capabilities at 6 months post-surgery compared to patients with lower kinesiophobia levels. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that kinesiophobia is an independent risk factor affecting functional rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty (p<0.01). The retrospective study results demonstrate that kinesiophobia significantly impacts the functional rehabilitation process of patients after knee replacement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Problems in SurgerySame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207