The impact of project management skills, IT integration, supply chain coordination, process innovation, and communication language on organizational performance in educational institutions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of project management capabilities on organizational performance, with a particular focus on the mediating roles of supply coordination, information technology integration, and process innovation. Data was collected from 85 suppliers providing goods and services to educational institutions in Irbid, Jordan, through questionnaires distributed from January 2025. The research adopts a causal quantitative approach, SEM-PLS to analyze the relationships between the variables. The findings reveal that project management capabilities positively influence supply coordination, information technology integration, and process innovation. Moreover, information technology integration and supply coordination significantly enhance organizational performance. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how project management practices, supported by effective technology integration and strong supply chain coordination, can lead to improvements in organizational performance, especially within educational settings. The results underscore the importance of aligning project management capabilities with technological and collaborative strategies to promote innovation and efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it