MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408177723 · doi:10.1080/87559129.2025.2474641

Intelligent Quality Control of Starch-Rich Root and Tuber Products in the Cold Chain Logistics: Research Progress and Challenges

2025· article· en· W4408177723 on OpenAlexaff
Min Zhang, Arun S. Mujumdar, Zhenjiang Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Reviews International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Supply Chain Traceability
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaHigher Education Discipline Innovation Project
KeywordsCold chainQuality (philosophy)StarchControl (management)BusinessFood scienceBiotechnologyChemistryBiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starch-rich root and tuber products (RTs) are critical to maintaining food security worldwide. However, they are at risk of loss and waste because of postharvest physiological losses. Cold chain logistics (CCL) are essential for maintaining the quality of RTs and extending their shelf life during storage and transport. This review discusses the reasons for and phenomena of the quality deterioration of RTs in CCL and common nondestructive detection techniques for the quality of RTs. Environmental conditions are important factors influencing the postharvest quality of RTs. The application of Internet of Things (IoT) for real-time monitoring of environmental parameters of RTs in CCL is described in detail, especially sensor technology. Finally, methods targeting the quality management of RTs for all stages of CCL were presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood Reviews InternationalSame topicFood Supply Chain TraceabilityFrench-language works237,207