Optimized crane mat design and transit path planning using a graph search algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Designing temporary crane transit paths in large construction sites with varying geological profiles presents two challenges: (1) ensuring safe, efficient, and cost-effective operations, and (2) developing optimization solutions that consider material properties, ground loading, and site layout. This paper addresses these challenges by integrating a graph search algorithm with crane mat structural design to optimize crane mat layouts and transit paths. A case study of structural steel subassembly installations, based on a real-world project, demonstrates the method’s effectiveness. The results highlight safety-focused crane mat designs and transit plans, along with significant cost savings compared to traditional heuristics. • Designs optimized transit paths for large-capacity mobile cranes. • Proposes an analytical approach to optimize crane mat design and transit paths. • Reduces crane mat material usage and field overhead costs. • Enhances crane safety by analyzing ground pressure and slope. • Automates optimization via a prototype computer program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it