MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408226088 · doi:10.2196/59801

Applying Robotic Process Automation to Monitor Business Processes in Hospital Information Systems: Mixed Method Approach

2025· article· en· W4408226088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Process Automation Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBusiness process reengineeringProcess (computing)End userProcess automation systemAutomationProcess managementWorld Wide WebEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) have undergone significant changes due to advancements in technology, including artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and cloud services. The increasing complexity within health care systems necessitates enhanced process reengineering and system monitoring approaches. Robotic process automation (RPA) provides a user-centric approach to monitoring system complexity by mimicking end user interactions, thus presenting potential improvements in system performance and monitoring. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the application of RPA in monitoring the complexities of EMR systems within a hospital environment, focusing on RPA's ability to perform end-to-end performance monitoring that closely reflects real-time user experiences. METHODS: The research was conducted at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital using a mixed methods approach. It included the iterative development and integration of RPA bots programmed to simulate and monitor typical user interactions with the hospital's EMR system. Quantitative data from RPA process outputs and qualitative insights from interviews with system engineers and managers were used to evaluate the effectiveness of RPA in system monitoring. RESULTS: RPA bots effectively identified and reported system inefficiencies and failures, providing a bridge between end user experiences and engineering assessments. The bots were particularly useful in detecting delays and errors immediately following system updates or interactions with external services. Over 3 years, RPA monitoring highlighted discrepancies between user-reported experiences and traditional engineering metrics, with the bots frequently identifying critical system issues that were not evident from standard component-level monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: RPA enhances system monitoring by providing insights that reflect true end user experiences, which are often overlooked by traditional monitoring methods. The study confirms the potential of RPA to act as a comprehensive monitoring tool within complex health care systems, suggesting that RPA can significantly contribute to the maintenance and improvement of EMR systems by providing a more accurate and timely reflection of system performance and user satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it