Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marker-assisted selection (MAS) has become an indispensable tool in modern soybean breeding, enabling precise and efficient improvement of key agronomic traits. This study explores the principles and applications of MAS in enhancing both biotic and abiotic stress resistance, as well as quality and yield traits in soybean. The study begins by outlining the various genetic markers utilized in MAS, such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and quantitative trait loci (QTLs), along with the key techniques and tools employed, including high-throughput genotyping platforms, marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC), and genomic selection (GS). Following this, the study delves into the successful application of MAS in soybean trait improvement, providing an in-depth case study on soybean cyst nematode resistance, which exemplifies the effectiveness of MAS in addressing significant agricultural challenges. Recent technological advancements, such as the integration of MAS with genomic selection and the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 to complement MAS strategies, are discussed. The study also addresses current limitations, including cost, resource requirements, and genetic background effects, while providing insights into future directions that emphasize the integration of MAS with other emerging breeding technologies. Ultimately, this paper highlights the pivotal role of MAS in accelerating soybean breeding and its potential to contribute to the development of climate-resilient and high-yielding soybean varieties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".